Narrative Intricacy in Robert Southey’s Storyworld: Locutor Voice and Monitority in “The Battle of Blenheim”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59045/nalans.2024.63

Keywords:

Monitority, locutor voice, Robert Southey, narrative poetry, Romantic poetry

Abstract

This study explores the narrative intricacy of Robert Southey’s “The Battle of Blenheim” by examining the use of monitority and locutor voice. Using these techniques, the paper analyses how the poet represents the ‘restricted perspective of the locutor’ rather than a distanced straightforward historical narrative of the experience of battle, providing an intrinsic and particularised perspective on war and prompting reflection on it. Southey’s strategy of monitority thus carries an evaluative dimension, revealing the experienced and characterised aspects of war and deviating from external generalisations of war. However, the locutor voice, which captures the focalised perspective, tone, and discourse, articulates the characters’ emotional states. The interplay of monitority and locutor voice creates an intricate narrative of the war, highlighting its brutality, the anguish and the emotional burden it inflicts. The portrayal of war’s catastrophic nature counters the traditional glorification of war as a victory, while the protracted emotional engagement indicates psychological effects on individuals. As such, Southey’s poem turns out to be an acute narrative of war, driven by a crafty interaction of monitoring and locutor voice, examines the war with polyvocal shades of fancy, joy, suffering and eventual loss, which engages the readers with critical distance as well as empathy and sympathy with those affected by its utter consequences.

Author Biography

References

Abrams, M. H. (1971). The mirror and the lamp: romantic theory and the critical tradition. Oxford University Press.

Harling, P. (1998). Robert Southey and the Language of Social Discipline. Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies, 30(4), 630–655. https://doi.org/10.2307/4053852

Heleniak, K. M. (1990). Old Kaspar: Pictorial Pacifism in the Napoleonic Period. The Art Bulletin, 72(1), 107.

Çıraklı, M. Z. (2010) Narrative Strategies and Meaning in Golding’s Fiction. VDM.

Foucault, M. (1984). “What is an author?” In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. Pantheon Books.

Leask, N. (2016). Southey’s Madoc: Reimagining the conquest of America. In L. Pratt Editor. Robert Southey and the Contexts of English Romanticism. Taylor & Francis.

Meachen, E. (1979). History and Transcendence in Robert Southey’s Epic Poems. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, 19(4), 590

Meachen, Edward W. (1980). From an Historical Religion to a Religion of History: Robert Southey and the Heroic in History. Clio, 9, 229.

O’Neill, M. (2011). Telling Stories: Southey and Romantic Narrative. The Wordsworth Circle, 42(1), 34.

Raimond, J. (1989). Southey’s Early Writings and the Revolution. The Yearbook of English Studies, 19, 181–196.

Schwartz, M. R. (2013). The Limits of Gore and Sympathy in Pacific Poetry: Southey and Hunt against an Augustan Tradition. Arts of War and Peace, 1(2), 4-9.

Sonoi, C. (2011). Southey’s Radicalism and the Abolitionist Movement. The Wordsworth Circle, 42(1), 26.

Southey, R. (1851). The complete poetical works of Robert Southey. D. Appleton & Company. http://books.google.com/books?id=Sybtr1k4bAIC

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Narrative Intricacy in Robert Southey’s Storyworld: Locutor Voice and Monitority in “The Battle of Blenheim”. (2024). Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 12(26), 341-350. https://doi.org/10.59045/nalans.2024.63