The Narration Process in Eco’s Understanding Fiction and Reality

Authors

  • Bujar Hoxha Full professor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59045/nalans.2023.38

Keywords:

semiosis, narration, Eco, time

Abstract

The present paper shall aim to demonstrate that a narration process is a semiotic tool, which, among other tasks, serves to execute a process of signification. My effort shall range from factual “stories” and “retold stories” to fictional ones. This is so because semiotics treats various “realities”, from which some may be realistically occurring, while others may represent imaginative “facts” invented by authors. One of the differences between the two, as Eco has also pointed out, is the factor of “time”, which is both semiotically and philosophically relevant. The purpose of this text is also to demonstrate that narration can be conceived of in multiple sorts of “times”, out of which only one we can physically live (above all, as one of the differences between artistic creation and real-time narration). A “fictive reality” relates to artistic creativities that are an object to their semiotic shaping and interpretation. In conclusion, one can state that interpretative semiotics is competent for this vision and relevant for the method’s future development.

References

Barthes, R. (1992). S/Z. Hill and Wang.

Beker, M. (1991). Semiotika književnosti. Zavod za znanost o kjiževnosti Filozofskoga Fakulteta u Zagrebu.

Benveniste, E. (1975). Problemi opšte lingvistike. Nolit.

Bourdieu, P. (1982). Language & Symbolic Power. Polity Press.

Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic structures. Walter de Gruyter.

Deely, J. (2009). Purely Objective Reality. Mouton, de Gruyter.

Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and Difference. The University of Chicago.

Eco, U. (1968). La struttura assente (la ricerca semiotica e il metodo strutturale). Bompiani.

Eco, U. (1975). Trattato di semiotica generale. Bompiani.

Eco, U. (1976). ‘A Theory of Semiotics’ (T. A.Sebeok, Ed.). Indiana University Press.

Eco, U. (1979). Lector in fabula(la cooperazione interpretativa nei testi narrativi). Bompiani.

Eco, U. (1984). The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Text. Indiana University Press.

Eco, U. (1989). The Open Work. Harvard University Press.

Eco, U. (1994a). Sei passeggiate nei boschi narrativi (Haravard University Norton Lectures 1992-3). Bompiani.

Eco, U. (1994b). Six Walks in the Fictional Woods. Harvard University Press, Copyright 1994 by the President and Fellows of the Harvard College.

Greimas, A. J. (1973). On Meaning. University of Minnesota Press.

Hegel, G. W. F., & Knox, T. M. (1998). Aesthetics: Lectures on fine art, Volume 1. Oxford University Press.

Heidegger, M. (1988). Bitak i vrijeme. Naprijed.

Hoxha, B. (2016). Semiotics of precision and imprecision. ‘Semiotica’ ‘Journal of the International Association of Semiotic Studies, 2016(213), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0077

Hoxha, B. (2022). ‘Umberto Eco’s Semiotics: Theory, methodology and Poetics’ (First Edit). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://www.cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-5275-7746-6

Jakobson, R. (1983). Linguvistika i poetika. Nolit.

Peirce, C. S. (1960). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Volume I: ‘Principles of Philosophy’ and Volume II: ‘Elements of Logic”) (C. & Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.). The Belknap of Harvard University Press.

Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Hoxha, B. (2023). The Narration Process in Eco’s Understanding Fiction and Reality. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 11(23), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.59045/nalans.2023.38