“Boggy, Soggy, Squitchy Pictures”: Adaptations of Moby-Dick in the Art of Jean-Michel Basquiat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59045/nalans.2024.49Keywords:
Adaptation, Media combination, transposition, visual art, image-textAbstract
Throughout the twentieth century, Moby-Dick has inspired countless visual artists. Painters, sculptors, illustrators, all tried their hand at reimagining Melville’s great whaling epic through their works. From Karl Knaths to Jackson Pollock, from Frank Stella to Matt Kish, a diverse plethora of creators engaged with Melville’s magnus opus, tackling its everlasting legacy by means of idiosyncratic and experimental art responses. Building upon the theoretical framework of adaptation studies (Elliott, Hutcheon, Rippl), this article investigates Jean-Michel Basquiat’s visual adaptations of Moby-Dick in Untitled (1986) and Melville (1987). Basquiat’s approach, I argue, transcends conventional adaptive techniques by producing works of art that challenge the (im)possibility of representing the real and respond to Melville’s epistemological and ontological concerns in original ways.
This article seeks to explore how visual and verbal representation in Basquiat’s paintings can exist as part of an adaptive process that inevitably involves a dialogic reinterpretation of Moby-Dick. My contention is that Basquiat’s aesthetic endeavor mirrors Ishmael’s intellectual quest, and his fascination with Melville’s text may stem from the writer’s manipulation of narrative conventions and structures. As Ishmael’s narration, Basquiat encompasses Ahab’s, Queequeg’s, and Fleece’s character traits, all the while probing the boundary between reality and visual depictions in an existential manner, superseding the limits between diegesis and mimesis. Simultaneously, Basquiat attempts to deconstruct language, echoing Melville’s “careful disorderliness”.
References
Beachy-Quick, D. (2022). On Ekphrasis. In W. Kelley, & C. Ohge (Eds). A New Companion to Herman Melville (pp. 512-518). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bloom, T. L. (2015). Plate Commentaries. In T. L. Bloom & D. Buchhart (Eds.) Basquiat: The Unknown Notebooks. Skira Rizzoli Publications.
Bloom, T. L., & Buchhart, D. (2015). Basquiat: The unknown notebooks. Skira Rizzoli Publications.
Bryant, J. (2002). The Fluid Text: A Theory of a Revision and Editing for Book and Screen. The University of Michigan Press.
--- (2013). “Adaptation and Adaptive Revision: The Problem of Textual Identity” In J. Bruhn et al (Eds.). Adaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions (pp. 47–67). Bloomsbury Academic.
Brooklyn Museum. (2015). Basquiat: The Unknown Notebooks - Teaching Resource: Special Exhibition. Retrieved January 28, 2024. https://www.brooklynmuseum.org/exhibitions/basquiat_notebooks/
Calvino, I. (2013). Why Read the Classics? (M. McLaughlin, Trans.). Penguin UK. (Original work published 1991)
Clüver, C. (2017) Chapter 26 Ekphrasis and Adaptation. In Leitch, T. (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Adaptation Studies (pp.459-476). Oxford University Press.
Elliott, K. (2003). Rethinking the Novel-Film Debate. Cambridge University Press.
---. (2012). The Adaptation of Adaptation: A Dialogue between the Arts and Sciences. In P. Nicklas & O. Lindner (Eds.), Adaptation and Cultural Appropriation: Literature, Film, and the Arts (pp. 145-161). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272239.145
---. (2020). Theorizing Adaptation. Oxford University Press.
Emmerling, L. (2015). Basquiat. Taschen.
Fanning Garbarini, S. (2006) “Kings of the Upside-Down World”: Challenging White Hegemony in Moby-Dick. In Bryant, J. et al. (Eds.), Ungraspable Phantom: Essays on Moby-Dick (pp. 209-24). Kent State University Press.
Fedi (2015). Prefazione. In Zaganelli, G. & Marino, T. (Eds) Saggi di Cultura Visuale. Arte, Letteratura e Cinema (pp. 7-9). Fausto Lupetti Editore.
Gates, H.L. (2015). Sweet Bird of Youth. In T. L. Bloom & D. Buchhart (Eds.) Basquiat: The unknown notebooks. Skira Rizzoli Publications.
Heffernan, J. A. W. (2004) Museum of Words. The Poetry of Ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery. University of Chicago Press
--- (2015). Chapter 1 Ekphrasis: Theory. In Rippl, G (Ed.) Handbook of Intermediality Literature - Image - Sound – Music (pp. 54-73). De Gruyter.
Hogeback, J. (2016, September 28). Are Black and White Colors? Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/story/are-black-and-white-colors
Hutcheon, L. (2013). A Theory of Adaptation. Routledge.
Isekenmeier, G. (2015). Chapter 17 Literary Visuality: Visibility – Visualisation – Description. In Rippl, G (Ed.) Handbook of Intermediality Literature - Image - Sound – Music (pp. 408-32). De Gruyter.
Lessing, G. E. (1984) Laocoon: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry (E. A. McCormick Trans). Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1766)
Mariani, G. (2013). Pulp(y) fiction: A Dylan Dog Adaptation of Moby-Dick. Leviathan, 15(3), pp. 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1353/lvn.2013.0033
-- (2006). “Chiefly Known by His Rod” The Book of Jonah, Mapple’s Sermon, Scapegoating. In Bryant, J. et al. (Eds.), Ungraspable Phantom: Essays on Moby-Dick (pp. 37–57). Kent State University Press.
Melville, H. (2007). Moby-Dick. J. Bryant & H. Springer (Eds.), Longman Publishing Group. (Original work published 1851)
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1994) Picture Theory. Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. University of Chicago Press
--- (2005). The Unspeakable and the Unimaginable: Word and Image in a Time of Terror. ELH, 72(2), pp. 291–308. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30029975
Pairone, D.W. (2012) A Wider Semiotics. Indagine su pittura, astrazione e linguaggio. In Zaganelli, G. & Marino, T. (Eds), Saggi di Cultura Visuale. Arte, Letteratura e cinema (pp. 185-202). Fausto Lupetti Editore.
Pesmen, D. (2000). “A Boggy, Soggy, Squitchy Picture, Truly”: Notes on Image Making in Anthropology and Elsewhere. Anthropology and Humanism, 25, (pp.111-119). https://doi.org/10.1525/ahu.2000.25.2.111
Pfeiler, M. (2013) Hunting Moby Dick: Melville in the Global Context of the American Studies. Leviathan 15(3), 81-89. https://doi:10.1353/lvn.2013.0031.
Rajewsky, I. (2005). Intermediality, intertextuality, and remediation: A literary perspective on intermediality. Intermédialités: histoire et théorie des arts, des lettres et des techniques/Intermediality: History and Theory of the Arts, Literature and Technologies, (6), 43-64. Centre de recherche sur l'intermédialité https://doi.org/10.7202/1005505ar
Rippl, G. (2015). Handbook of Intermediality: Literature – Image – Sound – Music. De Gruyter.
Saggese, J.M. (2014). Reading Basquiat: Exploring Ambivalence in American Art. University of California Press
Schultz, E. A. (1995). Unpainted to the Last: Moby-Dick and Twentieth-Century American Art. University Press of Kansas
---. (2006). Chapter 34: Creating Icons: Melville in Visual Media and Popular Culture. In Kelley W. (Ed), A Companion to Herman Melville (pp. 532–52). Blackwell Pub.
Simonetti, P. (2013) “Something Further May Follow”: Melville’s Legacy and Contemporary Adaptations of The Confidence-Man. Leviathan 15(3) (pp. 117-130). https://doi:10.1353/lvn.2013.0022
Stackhouse, C. (2015). Basquiat’s Poetics. In T. L. Bloom & D. Buchhart (Eds.), Basquiat: The unknown notebooks. Skira Rizzoli Publications.
Stercken, A. (2014). [Arte] Fact, Object, Image. Jean-Michel Basquiat’s Archives of the Black Atlantic. In G. Genge & A. Stercken (Eds.), Art History and Fetishism Abroad: Global Shiftings in Media and Methods (pp. 129–158). Transcript Verlag
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Narrative and Language Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.