Pause as a Linguistic Element in Ernest Hemingway’s Old Man at the Bridge, The Three Day Blow and The Revolutionist
This study explores the significance of silence in Ernest Hemingway’s selected short stories. The study attempts to reveal the web of relationships between silence (as represented through linguistic elements) and certain themes and examines the interactive arrangement pertaining to these issues. Using the terminology of discourse analysis, this study deals with the functions and implications of silence, which, manifesting itself as “pause” in discourse, has a value of signification. The impetus behind this study is therefore to investigate which linguistic elements produce the patterns of silence that indicate declaration of nothingness, psychological resistance and ideological stance. In the first part of the discussion section, the thesis argues that, first; silence is used as a thematic marker, implying nothingness. Second, psychological resistance is of the fictional characters is depicted through silence. Lastly, silence contributes to the representation of ideological stance.
Benson, J. J. (1969). Hemingway: The writer’s art of self-defence. Minneapolis :University of Minnesota Press.
Berman, R. (2003). Fitzgerald-Wilson-Hemingway: Language and experience. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Avon: Cambridge University Press.
Brustein, W. & Berntson M. (1999). Interwar fascist popularity in Europe and the default of the left. American Sociological Review, 56, 159-178.
Erman, B. (2001). Pragmatic markers revisited with a focus on you know in adult and adolescent talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1337-1359.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. Taylor & Francis Routledge.
Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Van Dijk (Eds.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, Vol. 2 (pp. 258-284). London: Sage.
Foucault, M. (1977). Language, counter-memory, practice. (eds.) Bouchard, D. F. & S. Simon, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Greaney, P. (2005). Less is more American short story minimalism in Ernest Hemingway, Raymond Carver and Frederick Barthelme. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Open University.
Hemingway, E. (1944). The first forty nine stories. Oxford: Arrow Publishing.
Hemingway, E. (1996). A Moveable feast. New York: Scribner.
Holtgraves, T. (2002). Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Herman, V. (1995). Dramatic discourse: Dialogue as interaction in plays. Routledge.
Herman, V. (1998). Turn management in drama. In J. Culpeper & M. Short (Eds.), Exploring the Language of Drama: From Text to Context (pp. 19-34). New York: Routledge.
Johnstone, B. (2002). Discourse analysis. Blackwell Publishing.
Leech, G. and Short, M. (1981). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction English fictional prose. Pearson Education Limited.Morgan, P. (2004). Italian fascism: 1915–1945. Palgrave McMillan.
Reynolds, M. (2000). Ernest Hemingway, 1899-1961: A brief biography. In L. Wagner Martin (Eds.), A Historical Guide to Ernest Hemingway (pp. 15-53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Updike, J. (2003). The Early Stories 1953–1975. Alfred A. Knopf Inc..
Van Wyck Bienduga, R. (1999). Topics in Hemingway, Unpublished Master Dissertation. California State University, USA.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. London: Oxford University Press.
Wodak R. & Meyer M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage Publications