Practicum Students’ Views on Distance Learning via TV Broadcast for Secondary Schools

Authors

  • Bilal Genç Erciyes University
  • Volkan Darmaz Malatya Turgut Özal University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59045/nalans.2023.37

Keywords:

distance learning via TV broadcast, COVID-19, secondary school, language teaching

Abstract

Due to the outbreak of COVID-19 in late 2019 and early 2020 across the world, many countries turned to distance education platforms. By the beginning of March, 2020 Turkey also started TV classes for almost 18 million students of primary and secondary schools. This study aims to explore the extent to which pre-service English teachers auditing a distance English language course for secondary school students considered that the distance courses had achieved the course objectives, and perceived advantages and disadvantages in distance courses. The participants in the study were 60 pre-service teachers who attended a practicum study for the first five weeks of the 2019-2020 academic year spring semester. Since the classes in primary, secondary, and tertiary education were taught online for the rest of the spring semester, the practicum students were assigned to watch English classes taught on free TV channels which were also broadcast on the internet to let the students watch again at their own pace. The data were collected through three open-ended interview questions. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the transcribed data. The results indicate that, although teachers on the course agreed that TV courses were not able to achieve the course objectives, they mentioned advantageous and disadvantageous aspects of distance learning via TV broadcast and offered ways to improve it.  

Author Biographies

Bilal Genç, Erciyes University

Professor Dr. Bilal Genç - Erciyes University - Department of English Language and Literature

Volkan Darmaz, Malatya Turgut Özal University

Volkan Darmaz holds a doctorate in English Language Teaching from Ataturk University, and currently is an Assisstant Proffesor at the Department of Translation and Interpreting at Malatya Turgut Özel University.   

   E-mail: volkan.darmaz@ozal.edu.tr

References

Altunay, D. (2019). EFL Students’ Views on Distance English Language Learning in a Public University in Turkey. Studies in English Language Teaching 7(1), 121- 134.

Aragon, S., Johnson, S., & Shaik, N. (2002). The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online vs. face-to-face environment. The American Journal of Distance Education 16(4), 227-243.

Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını. AUAd, 3(2), 85-124.

Armborst, A. (2017). Thematic proximity in content analysis. SAGE Open, 7(2), 1–11.

Burns, M. (2011). Distance Education for Teacher Training: Modes, Models, and Methods. Washington: Education Development Center, Inc.

Çalık, E. Ö. & İ. F., Altay (2021). Analysis of English lesson broadcasts during emergency remote teaching from pedagogical, instructional and technical aspects. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science 1(2), 71–87.

Elliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850-2861. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss11/14 on 10 October 2020.

Holmberg, B. (2008). The Evolution, Principles and Practices of Distance Education. BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg.

Koç, E. (2020). An Evaluation of Distance Learning in Higher Education through the Eyes of Course Instructors. Akdeniz Üniversites Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 3(1), 25-39.

Kolb, D. (1994). Experiential learning. New York: Prentice-Hall.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.

Martin, M. (1978). The Application of Spiraling to the Teaching of Grammar. TESOL Quarterly, 12(2), 151-161.

Özkanal, Ü., Yüksel, İ., & Başaran-Uysal, B. Ç. (2020). The pre-service teachers’ reflection-on-action during distance practicum: A critical view on EBA TV English courses. Egitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi – Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(4), 1347-1364. doi: 10.14689/issn.2148-2624.8c.4s.12m

Ozudogru, F., &Hismanoglu, M. (2016). Views of university students on foreign language courses delivered via e-learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE)17(1), 31-47.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Reichertz, J. (2009). Abduction: The Logic of Discovery of Grounded Theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(1), Art. 13, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1001135.

Saglik, M., & Ozturk, S. (2001). Television as an Educational Technology: Using Television at Open Education Faculty, Anadolu Universty. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2(1).

Saldana, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (2nd ed.). Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.

The Council of Higher Education. (2020). Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında Uzaktan Öğretime İlişkin Usul ve Esaslar. Retrieved from https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Uzaktan_ogretim/yuksekogretim_kurumlarinda_uzaktan_ogretime_iliskin_usul_ve_esaslar.pdf on 15 June 2020

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications: London.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Genç, B., & Darmaz, V. (2023). Practicum Students’ Views on Distance Learning via TV Broadcast for Secondary Schools. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 11(23), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.59045/nalans.2023.37