Testing the Borders of Tolerance: Chivalry Glazed with Monstrosity, Violence and Cruelty in Richard Coer de Lyon



Monster, Romance, Crusades, Chivalry, Richard I.


Monstrosity is an elusive term that is interlocked with the concept of normality. As a cultural construct, monster’s elusiveness stems from its contingency to spatio-temporal parameters that are ever-changing so that the normative self’s attempt at constructing an enclosed identity is essentially vulnerable. The normative self’s continued attempts to attribute monstrosity to the other to establish an enclosed and normative selfhood invariably fail because the fluidity of monstrous identity disrespects any of the constructed boundaries between the self and the other. Accordingly, in the romance genre, monstrous identity is inextricably linked with the chivalrous identity. Analysis of monstrosity is a useful lens for exposing the discursive boundaries between the two, and displaying that chivalry is an ideal impossible to maintain. This is especially because the formulation of chivalric identity is based on malleable precepts such as moral, cultural, religious norms and performative compliance or deviance enable transition across the constructed boundaries between the knight and the monstrous other. This article defines monstrosity as excess, lack, or deviance from chivalric behaviour so that subjects are rendered monstrous due to becoming sources of undeserved harm or violence. From this perspective, this article analyses the fluidity of chivalrous and monstrous identities in Richard Coer de Lyon. Crusades offer symbolic and literal spaces of alterity and convergence between the East and the West in perpetual contestation. However, the attributed monstrosity of the Saracen against the moral superiority of the Christian knight is a fragile binary that is not static but in constant negotiation that makes it fluid. This fluidity is investigated through the conformity or non-conformity of Richard and other European rulers to chivalric principles and monstrosity in the romance.


Akbari, S. C. (2005). The Hunger for National Identity in Richard Coer de Lion. In R. M. Stein & S. P. Prior (Eds.), Reading Medieval Culture: Essays in Honor of Robert W. Hanning (pp. 198–227). essay, University of Notre Dame Press.

Ambrisco, A. (1999). Cannibalism and Cultural Encounters in Richard Coeur de Lion. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 29, 499–528.

Ashe, L. (2014). The Ideal of Knighthood in English and French Writing, 1100–1230: Crusade, Piety, Chivalry and Patriotism. In M. G. Bull & D. Kempf (Eds.), Writing the Early Crusades: Text, Transmission and Memory (pp. 155–169). essay, The Boydell Press.

Behrend, H. (2011). Resurrecting Cannibals: The Catholic Church, Witch-hunts and the Production of Pagans in Western Uganda. Woodbridge.

Bernard de Clairevaux. (2000). In Praise of the New Knighthood: A Treatise on the Knight's Templar and the Holy Places of Jerusalem. (In M. C. Greenia, Ed). Medieval Institute Publications.

Blurton, H. (2007). Cannibalism in High Medieval English Literature. Palgrave Macmillan.

Broughton, B. B. (1966). The Legends of King Richard I Coeur de Lion: A Study of Sources and Variations to the Year 1600. Hague.

Busby, K. (Ed.). (1983). Le Roman Des Eles and L'Ordene De Chevalerie: Two Early Old French Didactic Poems. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Butler, J. (2002). Gender Trouble. Routledge.

Cohen, J. J. (1996). Monster Culture (Seven Theses). In J. J. Cohen (Ed.), Monster Theory: Reading Culture (pp. 3–26). essay, University of Minnesota Press.

Cohen, J. J. (1999). Of Giants: Sex, Monsters, and the Middle Ages. University of Minnesota Press.

Coleman, J. (1981). English Literature in History 1350-1400: Medieval Readers and Writers, 1350-1400. Columbia University Press.

Crouch, D. (2011). The English Aristocracy, 1070-1272: A Social Transformation. Yale University Press.

Elias, M. (2017). Violence, Excess, and the Composite Emotional Rhetoric of Richard Coeur de Lion. Studies in Philology, 114(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2017.0000

Finlayson, J. (1990). ‘Richard, Coer De Lyon’: Romance, History or Something in Between? Studies in Philology, 87(2), 156–180.

Flori, J. (2007). Richard the Lionheart: King and Knight. (J. Birrell, Trans.). Praeger.

Florschuetz, A. (2014). Marking Maternity in Middle English Romance: Mothers, Identity, and Contamination. Palgrave Macmillan.

Gillingham, J. (1994). Richard Coeur de Lion: Kingship, Chivalry and War in the Twelfth Century. Hambledon.

Guard, T. (2013). Chivalry, Kingship and Crusade: the English Experience in the Fourteenth Century. The Boydell Press.

Heng, G. (2012). Empire of Magic Medieval Romance and the Politics of Cultural Fantasy. Columbia University Press.

Kearney, R. (2003). Strangers, Gods and Monsters: Interpreting Otherness. Routledge.

Larkin, P. (Ed.). (2015). Richard Coer de Lyon. Medieval Institute Publications.

Livingston, A. A. (1907). Grifon 'Greek'. Modern Language Notes, 2(2), 47–49.

Loomis, R. S. (1915). Richard Cœur de Lion and the Pas Saladin in Medieval Art. PMLA, 30(3), 509. https://doi.org/10.2307/456947

Maier, C. T. (2000). Crusade Propaganda and Ideology: Model Sermons for the Preaching of the Cross. Cambridge University Press.

McDonald, N. (2004). Eating People and the Alimentary Logic of Richard Cœur de Lion. In N. McDonald (Ed.), Pulp fictions of Medieval England: Essays in Popular Romance (pp. 124–151). essay, Manchester University Press.

Morris, C. (1983). Propaganda for War the Dissemination of the Crusading Ideal in the Twelfth Century. Studies in Church History, 20, 79–101.

Nicholson, H. J. (2001). Love, War, and the Grail: Templars, Hospitallers, and Teutonic Knights in Medieval Epic and Romance, 1150-1500. Brill.

Oxford University Press. (2008). The Bible: Authorized King James Version with Apocrypha.

Rider, J. (2000). The Other Worlds of Romance. In R. Krueger (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Romance (pp. 115–131). essay, Cambridge University Press.

Riley-Smith, J. (1993). The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading. Continuum.

Robert the Monk. (1971). Urban and the Crusaders. In D. C. Munro (Ed.), Translations and Reprints from the Original Sources of European History (pp. 5–8). essay, University of Pennsylvania Press.

Shildrick, M. (2002). Embodying the Monster: Encounters with the Vulnerable Self. Sage.

Taylor, C. (2013). Chivalry and the Ideals of Knighthood in France during the Hundred Years War. Cambridge University Press.

Tolan, J. V. (2013). Sons of Ishmael: Muslims through European Eyes in the Middle Ages. University Press of Florida.

Tudor, A. P., Levy, B. J., & Coote, L. (2006). Laughing at Monsters in Richard Coeur de Lyon. In Grant Risee?: The Medieval Comic Presence: Essays in Memory of Brian J. Levy (pp. 193–211). essay, Brepols.

Uebel, M. (2005). Ecstatic Transformation: On the Uses of Alterity in the Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan.

Williams, D. (1996). Deformed Discourse: The Function of the Monster in Medieval Thought and Literature. McGill-Queen's University Press.

Yeager, S. M. (2011). Jerusalem in Medieval Narrative. Cambridge University Press.

Zupka Dušan. (2016). Ritual and Symbolic Communication in Medieval Hungary under the Arpád Dynasty (1000-1301). Brill.




How to Cite

Özgün, U. (2022). Testing the Borders of Tolerance: Chivalry Glazed with Monstrosity, Violence and Cruelty in Richard Coer de Lyon. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 10(19), 150–164. Retrieved from https://nalans.com/index.php/nalans/article/view/506