Supporting Academic Language Development for Multilingual Learners Across Content Areas Through the Identification of Textual Features
Keywords:
academic language, disciplinary literacies, multilingual learners, systemic functional linguistics, pre-service teacher educationAbstract
At a time when educators are tasked with ensuring that all students develop the academic literacy skills necessary for school success, this article investigates some textual features of academic language in different content areas using systemic functional linguistics (SFL) as an approach to support multilingual learners’ development of academic language (AL). The article provides a brief overview of SFL and demonstrates how this theoretical framework supports the development of AL. An analysis of a variety of texts across the content areas of English language arts, social studies, science, and mathematics at the elementary level illustrates different features of AL. Following this analysis, the article discusses these features of AL in contrast with everyday language. This article concludes with some implications for teacher education and research.
References
Accurso, K., Gebhard, M., & Selden, C. (2016). Supporting L2 elementary science writing with SFL in an age of school reform. In L. C. de Oliveira & T. Silva (Eds.), Second language writing in elementary classrooms: Instructional issues, content-area writing and teacher education (pp. 126–150). Palgrave Macmillan.
Adams, T. L. (2003). Reading mathematics: More than words can say. The Reading Teacher, 56(8), 786-795.
Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., Park, J. E., Amabisca, A., & Boscardin, C. K. (2008). Developing teacher capacity for serving ELLs' writing instructional needs: A case for systemic functional linguistics. Bilingual Research Journal, 31(1-2), 295-322. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15235880802640755
Anstrom, K., DiCerbo, P., Butler, F. A., Katz, A., Millet, J., & Rivera, C. (2010). A review of the literature on academic English: Implications for K–12 English language learners. George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education.
Aud, S. et al. (2010). The condition of education 2010 (NCES 2010–028). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
de Oliveira, L. C. (2007). Academic language development in the content areas: Challenges for English language learners. INTESOL Journal, 4(1), 22-33.
de Oliveira, L. C. (2011). A linguistic approach in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms: A focus on teacher education. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 4(2), 101-159.
de Oliveira, L. C., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2015). Focus on grammar and meaning. Oxford University Press.
de Oliveira, L. C., Sembiante, S., & Ramírez, J. A. (2018). Bilingual academic language development in mathematics for emergent to advanced bilingual students. In S. Crespo & S. Celedón-Pattichis, & M. Civil (Eds), Access and equity: Promoting high quality mathematics in grades 3-5 (pp. 81-98). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
Bailey, A. L., Butler, F. A., LaFramenta, C., & Ong, C. (2004). Towards the characterization of academic language in upper elementary classrooms. Regents of the University of California.
Brisk, M. E. (2020). Language in writing instruction: Enhancing literacy in grades 3-8. Routledge.
Brisk, M. E. (2014). Engaging students in academic literacies: Genre-based pedagogy for K-5 classrooms. Routledge.
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. Continuum.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.
Derewianka, B. (2011). A new grammar companion for teachers (2nd ed.). Primary English Teaching Association Australia.
Diaz, E., & Deroo, M. (2020). Latinx in contention: A systemic functional linguistics analysis of 11th Grade U.S. history textbooks. Theory of Research in Social Education, 48(3), 375-402.
Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. A&C Black.
Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(7), 587-597. https://www.doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.53.7.6
Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional perspective. Science Education, 89, 335-347.
Fenwick, L., Humphrey, S., Quinn, M., & Endicott, M. (2014). Developing deep understanding about language in undergraduate pre-service teacher programs through the application of knowledge. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 1-38. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1016572.pdf
Gebhard, M. (2019). Teaching and researching ELLs’ disciplinary literacy practices: SFL in action in the context of school reform. Routledge.
Gebhard, M., Chen, I. A., & Britton, L. (2014). “Miss, nominalization is a nominalization:” English language learners’ use of SFL metalanguage and their literacy practices. Linguistics and Education, 26, 106-125.
Gebhard, M., Willett, J., Jimenez, J., & Piedra, A. (2010). Systemic functional linguistics, teachers’ professional development, and ELLs’ academic literacy practices. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 91-110). Routledge.
Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247-273.
Hackett, J. K., Moyer, R. H., & Vasquez, J. (2008). Science: A closer look. Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
Harman, R. (2013). Literary intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2), 125-140.
Hodgson-Drysdale, T. (2016). Teaching writing through genres and language. In L. C. de Oliveira, & T. Silva (Eds), Second language writing in elementary classrooms: Instructional ıssues, content-area writing and teacher education (pp. 69-87). Palgrave Macmillan.
Humphrey, S. (2018). ‘We can speak to the world’: Applying meta-linguistic knowledge for specialized and reflexive literacies. In R. Harman (Ed.), Bilingual learners and social equity: Critical approaches to systemic functional linguistics. Springer.
Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17-29.
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 693-722.
Johns, A. M. (2002). Genre and ESL/EFL composition instruction. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 195-217). Cambridge University Press.
Lovell, P. (2011). Stand Tall, Molly Lou Melon. Penguin.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nded.). Continuum.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox.
McGraw-Hill Education (2018). Math Grade 3 1,000+ Problems (2nded.). McGraw-Hill.
McGraw-Hill Education (2018). Math Grade 4 1,000+ Problems (2nded.). McGraw-Hill.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2017). The nation’s report card. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
Paugh, P., & Moran, M. (2013). Growing language awareness in the classroom garden. Language Arts, 90(4), 253-267.
Rose., D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics of mathematics teaching and learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 139-159. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10573560601158461
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2012). Academic language in teaching and learning: Introduction to the special issue. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 409–418.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2013). The role of meta-language in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63(1), 153–170.
Schleppegrell, M. J., & O'Hallaron, C. L. (2011). Teaching academic language in L2 secondary settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 3-18.
Schulze, J. (2015). Academic language, English language learners, and systemic functional linguistics: Connecting theory and practice in teacher education. The CATESOL Journal, 21(1), 109-130.
Snow, C. E. & Uccelli, P. (2009). The challenge of academic language. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 112-133). Cambridge University Press.
Tardy, C. M. (2011). The history and future of genre in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(20), 1-5.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2017). State nonfiscal survey of public elementary and secondary education, 2015–16 [EDFacts file 141, Data Group 678]. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgf.asp
Zwiers, J. (2014). Building academic language: Meeting Common Core standards across disciplines (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Narrative and Language Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
