From Collegiality to Managerialism: An Allegorical Analysis of Universities through Animal Farm and Implications for the Age of Algorithmic Governance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59045/nalans.2026.101

Keywords:

Collegiality, Managerialism, Algorithmic governance, Animal Farm, Allegorical analysis

Abstract

In this study, I have sought to trace the transformation from collegial governance to managerialism in universities through the allegory of Animal Farm, and to explore implications of this transformation for the future of universities in the age of algorithmic governance. Accordingly, I have discovered that the evolution of universities from collegial governance to New Public Management (NPM) and subsequently to forms of algorithmic governance reflects a shift from visible configurations of power and meaning toward increasingly invisible ones. Just as the rewriting of slogans and rules in Orwell’s allegory transforms and redefines organizational reality, algorithmic systems today have become invisible governance mechanisms that redefine power, knowledge production, academic subjectivity, ethical value, and success in universities. This transformation extends beyond managerial power and control. It reshapes the position of academics as subjects, redefines the processes of knowledge production, and raises important ethical questions about academic practice. To navigate this transformation, universities must anchor technological change in their core collegial values—collaboration, academic freedom, ethical responsibility, and democratic governance. Otherwise, they risk losing their role as open spaces of critical inquiry and become opaque systems driven by algorithmic performance, ultimately creating their own “Frankenstein.”

Author Biography

  • Fatma Kılçık, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa
    Assoc. Prof. Dr. Fatma Kılçık holds a PhD in Educational Administration and is currently an associate professor at Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa in İstanbul, Turkey. Her research focuses on higher education, academic leadership, and gender issues, with a strong emphasis on critical theory, social justice, and inclusion in education. She also examines religious education policies and their implications within contemporary educational systems.

References

Ball, S. J. (2001). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society. In D. Gleeson & C. Husbands (Eds.), The performing school: Managing teaching and learning in a performance culture (pp. 210–226). Routledge.

Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (2nd ed.). SRHE/Open University Press.

Beer, D. (2019). The data gaze: Capitalism, power and perception. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526463210

Beerkens, M., & van der Hoek, M. (2022). Academic leaders and leadership in the changing higher education landscape. In C. Sarrico, M. J. Rosa, & T. Carvalho (Eds.), Research handbook on academic careers and managing academics. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839102639.00017

Benjamin, W. (2007). Franz Kafka: On the tenth anniversary of his death. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations: Essays and reflections (H. Zohn, Trans., pp. 104–117). Schocken Books.

Beyes, T., Costas, J., Ortmann, G. (2019). Novel thought: Towards a literary study of organization. Organization Studies, 40(12), 1787–1803. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619874458

Blackmore, J. (2003). Tracking the nomadic life of the educational researcher: What future for feminist public intellectuals and the performative university? The Australian Educational Researcher, 30(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216795

Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300167

Boberg, J. (2022). Lärosätenas interna organisation: Kollegialitet, demokrati och linjestyrning. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 124(1), 19–67. Retrieved from https://journals.lub.lu.se/st/article/view/24083.

Bowker, G. C. (2013). Data flakes: An afterword to “Raw data” is an oxymoron. In L. Gitelman (Ed.), “Raw data” is an oxymoron (pp. 167–172). MIT Press.

Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Published for the International Association of Universities (IAU) by Pergamon Press.

Cordelli C. (2020). The privatized state. Princeton University Press.

Czarniawska, B. (1998). A narrative approach to organization studies. Sage Publishing.

Davies, W. (2017). Elite power under advanced neoliberalism. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(5–6), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417715072

Dearlove, J. (1997). The academic labour process: From collegiality and professionalism to managerialism and proletarianisation? Higher Education Review, 30(1), 56–75.

Deem, R. (2004). The knowledge worker, the manager-academic and the contemporary UK university: New and old forms of public management? Financial Accountability & Management, 20(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2004.00189.x

Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: the case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980500117827

Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9125-5

Fire, M., & Guestrin, C. (2019). Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: Observing Goodhart's Law in action. GigaScience, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz053

Fisher, W. R. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51(1), 1–22 https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390180

Grafström, M., Jonsson, A. (2019). Professional blinders? The novel as an eye-opener in organizational analysis, Culture and Organization, 25(2), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2018.1508212

Guarini, E., Magli, F., & Francesconi, A. (2020). Academic logics in changing performance measurement systems: An exploration in a university setting. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 17(1), 109–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-06-2019-0076

Gulson, K. N., Sellar, S., & Webb, P. T. (2022). Algorithms of education: How datafication and artificial intelligence shape policy. University of Minnesota Press.

Guzmán-Valenzuela, C., Gómez-González, C., Rojas-Murphy Tagle, A., & Lorca-Vyhmeister, A. (2021). Learning analytics in higher education: A preponderance of analytics but very little learning? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00258-x

Introna, L. D. (2016). Algorithms, governance, and governmentality: on governing academic writing. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 17–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915587360.

Kallio, K. M., Kallio, T. J., Tienari, J., & Hyvönen, T. (2016). Ethos at stake: Performance management and academic work in universities. Human Relations, 69(3), 685–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715596802.

Knights, D., & Willmott, H. (1999). Management lives: Power and identity in work organizations. SAGE Publications.

Knox, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and education in China. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1754236

Kolsaker, A. (2008). Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: A study of English universities. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802372885.

Kostera, M. (2020). The imagined organization: Spaces, dreams and places. Edward Elgar Publishing

Martin, B. R., & Whitley, R. (2010). The UK research assessment exercise: A case of regulatory capture? In R. Whitley, J. Gläser, & L. Engwall (Eds.), Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation (pp. 51–82). Oxford University Press.

Meng, W. (2025). Algorithmic evaluation and the marginalization of single authorship in management science. arXiv Preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00842

Michaelson, C. (2016). Business in the work and world of David Foster Wallace. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(2), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492615600522

Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Prentice Hall.

Mittelman, J. H. (2019). To risk or derisk the soul of the university? The peril in educational globalization. Globalizations, 16(5), 707–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2019.1578065

Muller, J. Z. (2019). The tyranny of metrics. Princeton University Press.

Olsen, J. P. (2005). The institutional dynamics of the (European) university. ARENA Working Paper. Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo.

Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500108718.

Ortega y Gasset, J. (1992). The mission of the university. Transaction Publishers.

Popp Berman, E., & Paradeise, C. (Eds.). (2016). The university under pressure (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 46). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20160000046000

Pasquale, F.(2015). The black box society. Harvard University Press.

Pekşen, S., Rose, A.-L., Leišytė, L., & Želvys, R. (2025). The impact of managerialism on control and autonomy in the academic profession in Europe. In J. Jung & L. K. Horta (Eds.), University governance, management and the academic profession: Transformations and challenges in Europe, Asia and the Americas (pp. 93–115). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-86889-4_6.

Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press

Prinsloo, P. (2020). Of “black boxes” and algorithmic decision-making in (higher) education- A commentary. Big Data & Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720933994

Quaia, E., & Vernuccio, F. (2022). Finding a good balance between pressure to publish and scientific integrity and how to overcome temptation of scientific misconduct. Tomography, 8(4), 1851–1865. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8040155

Rhodes, C., Brown, A. D. (2005). Writing responsibly: Narrative fiction and organization studies. Organization, 12, 467–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405052757

Ruppert, E. (2012). The governmental topologies of database devices. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412439428

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Governing by numbers: Audit culture, rankings and the new world order. Social Anthropology, 23(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12098.

Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Tapper, T., & Palfreyman, D. (2010). The collegial tradition in the age of mass higher education. Springer.

Wang, Y. (2024). Algorithmic decisions in education governance: Implications and challenges. Discover Education, 3, 229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00337-x.

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications.

Weiherl, J., & Frost, J. (2016). Professional and organizational commitment in universities: From judgmental to developmental performance management. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), Multi-level governance in universities: Strategy, structure, control (pp. 131–149). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32678-8_8

Williamson, B. (2017). Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Kılçık, F. (2026). From Collegiality to Managerialism: An Allegorical Analysis of Universities through Animal Farm and Implications for the Age of Algorithmic Governance. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 14(29 | Special Issue), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.59045/nalans.2026.101