Promoting Student Creativity at Tertiary-level Education: A Qualitative Investigation of Lecturers’ Perspective
Though being more or less a cliché in the post-modern world, creativity, associated with new and novel, is the sine qua non of high quality education. Thus, creativity-fostering teachers enjoy a prestigious status on account of their several attributes including encouraging independent and cooperative learning, motivating learners to think divergently, and encouraging flexible-thinking and self-evaluation. As the concept is believed to merit much attention, and the field lacking a clear picture of the concept at the tertiary-level education needs a richer array of studies for a deeper understanding, the current qualitative inquiry was designed to investigate to what extent lecturers at tertiary-level education promote creativity, how they justify their attempts, and what they offer to foster creativity in university context. To this end, an interview inspired by the existing literature was reformulated and conducted with 5 voluntary lecturers instructing in the Department of English Language and Literature, at a northeastern university in Turkey. The findings indicated high levels of reference to tasked-based creativity. Yet, the participants voiced several curriculum, student, and culture-related challenges of fostering this desired feature in education. Documenting their suggestions related to the features of creativity, the paper ends with implications for practitioners and materials designers.
Alencar, E. M. L.S.D., Fleith, D.D.S., & Pereira, N. (2017). Creativity in higher education: Challenges and facilitating factors. Trends in Psychology, 25(2), 553-561.
Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 5th ed. Boston: pearson Education, Inc.
Blaxter, L., Hughes, C., & Tight, M. (1996). How to research. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Cachia, R., Ferrari, A:, Ala-Mutka, K., & Punie, Y. (2010). Creative learning and innovative teaching: Final report on on the study on creativity and innovation in education in the EU member states. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports EUR24675, European Commission, Spain: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
Cheung, R. H. (2017). Teacher-directed versus child-centred: the challenge of promoting creativity in Chinese preschool classrooms. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 25(1), 73- 86. doi:10.1080/14681366.2016.1217253
Collard, P., & Looney, J. (2014). Nurturing creativity in education. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 348-364.
Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113-127.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning: A guide for teachers and educators. Oxon: Routledge Falmer.
Cropley, A. J., & Cropley, D. (2009). Fostering creativity: A diagnostic approach for higher education and organizations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Doron, E. (2017). Fostering creativity in school aged children through perspective taking and visual media based short term intervention program. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 150-160. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.12.003
Egan, A., Maguire, R., Christophers, L., & Rooney, B. (2017). Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 21-27.
Gaspar, D., & Mabic, M. (2015). Creativity in higher education. Universal Journal of Educationla Research, 3(9), 598-605.
Gibson, H. (2005). What creativity isn’t: The presumptions of instrumental and individual justifications for creativity in education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(2), 148-167.
Hui, A. N. N., Chow, B. W.Y., Chan, A. Y.T., Chui, B. H. T., & Sam, C. T. (2015). Creativity in Hong Kong classrooms: Transition from a seriously formal pedagogy to informally playful learning. Education 3-13, 43(4), 393-403.
Jahnke, I., Haertel, T., & Wildt, J. (2017). Teachers’ conception of creativity in higher education. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 87-95.
Jónsdóttir, S. R. (2017). Narratives of creativity: How eight teachers on four school levels integrate creativity into teaching and learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 127-139.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S.M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. London: Hodder Arnold.
Orlando, M. (2012). Fostering creativity in higher education. Review of Higher Education and Self-learning, 5 (14), 54-61.
Özcan, D. (2010). Contributions of English teachers’ behaviours on students’ creative thinking abilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5850-5854 doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.956
Pang, W. (2015). Promoting creativity in the classroom: A generative view. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 122-127. doi:10.1037/aca0000009
Rinkevich, J. (2011). Creative teaching: Why it matters and where to begin. The Clearing House: A Journal of educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84(5), 219-223.
Saebo, A. B., McCammon, L. A., O’Farrell, L. (2007). Creative teaching-Teaching creativity. Caribbean Quarterly, 53(1-2), 205-215.
Soh, K. (2017). Fostering student creativity through teacher behaviors. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 58-66. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.002
Teske, J., Clausen, C. K., Gray, P., Smith, L. L., Subia, S. A., Szabo, M. R., & Rule, A. C. (2017). Creativity of third graders’ leadership cartoons: Comparison of mood- enhanced to neutral conditions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 217-226. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.003
Yildirim, A. (2010). Creativity in early childhood education program. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1561-1565. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.365
Copyright (c) 2019 Şakire Erbay Çetinkaya, Eren Kaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Narrarive and Language Studies (NALANS) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in NALANS.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in NALANS.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.